We spent this week further immersing ourselves in the life and deeds of John Brown and prepared for our trial.
Monday through Thursday, students further researched their role, created a script, and presented their roles to their teams for feedback. I was extremely impressed with the quality of the feedback and insight that was provided. Students noted questions that should have been asked, how to make an idea more clear, what part of responses should be avoided, and even notes on speed and delivery style. Even more impressive, was the grace and easy acceptance with which the students received the feedback.
On Friday, students filed into my courtroom prepared to present their cases using witnesses, evidence, and language designed to sway the jury. Opening and closing statements were passionate and concise, clearly explaining why their desired verdict was the only possible option and painting a clear picture of the events that made John Brown either a patriot or a traitor. The lawyers, in charge of direct examination, asked questions that confirmed the narrative they hoped proved the guilt or innocence of John Brown. While those that cross examined worked hard to guide the witnesses they questioned into confirming their version of events. The jury (thank you to all of the parents who volunteered) listened to each side, took notes, and through thoughtful deliberation, rendered a verdict for each case.
In period one it was determined that John Brown was not a traitor while in period three he was convicted of treason. In period two, the jury were unable to come to an agreement which resulted in a hung jury. For fifth grade purposes, that is considered a win for both sides.Â
Enjoy the pictures on the blog of the trials. I made sure to take pictures of every person in their role.
